Re: MS03-007

From: Jeff Cochran (jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com)
Date: 03/20/03


From: jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com (Jeff Cochran)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:07:10 GMT


On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:00:49 -0800, "F. Albert" <fmalbert@msn.com>
wrote:

>Before I apply this patch, where do I get the correct
>version of the NTOSKRNL.EXE? The present version on this
>server is 500.2195.4448. According to Computer World, this
>patch can lockup the server making it incapable of
>rebooting without the correct version of NTOSKRNL.EXE.
>Any ideas?

An upgrade to SP3 will do it, then apply the patch. Alternatively,
shut the holes through the registry tweaks provided.

Jeff



Relevant Pages

  • Re: MS03-007
    ... Good Luck! ... "This post represents MY opinion only" ... > Before I apply this patch, where do I get the correct ... > patch can lockup the server making it incapable of ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • MS03-007
    ... Before I apply this patch, where do I get the correct ... server is 500.2195.4448. ... rebooting without the correct version of NTOSKRNL.EXE. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • MS03-007
    ... Before I apply this patch, where do I get the correct ... server is 500.2195.4448. ... rebooting without the correct version of NTOSKRNL.EXE. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: [PATCH] writeback: avoid possible balance_dirty_pages() lockup on a light-load bdi
    ... congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); ... but after several iterations of my testcase & just before the lockup ... my patch is kind of duplicate efforts. ... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [stable] Soft lockups since stable kernel upgrade to 2.6.23.8
    ... Should this patch in the -stable tree be reverted? ... output of the softlockup detector: print the task that causes the lockup ... The old format was: ... soft lockup detected on CPU#1! ...
    (Linux-Kernel)

Loading