Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-007 - 815021

From: Dane (Dane352@hotmail.com)
Date: 03/18/03


From: "Dane" <Dane352@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 07:49:36 -0600


You might want to count the vulns against each, and how many allowed
complete control (root level access) of the server. Apache typically runs
with a limited set of permissions so if an attacker gets control of Apache
they haven't accomplished much, if it is a root level exploit then they own
the server. IIS typically runs with admin privelages so controll of IIS is
usually worse.

"Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]" <sbradcpa@pacbell.net>
wrote in message news:3E767CFA.9C805E97@pacbell.net...
> And what about all those lovely vulns in the Apache server?
>
> ANY web server is sitting duck these days no matter what flavor.
>
> Dane wrote:
>
> > "Jerry Bryant [MSFT]" <jbryant@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:u1vpELL7CHA.2272@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Title: Unchecked buffer in Windows component could cause web server
> > > compromise
> > > Date: March 17, 2003
> > > Software: Microsoft Windows 2000 All Versions
> > > Impact: Run code of attacker's choice
> > > Maximum Severity Rating: CRITICAL
> > > Bulletin: MS03-007
> >
> > Probably the greatest advice ever given
> > http://www3.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=101034
> > "Gartner recommends that enterprises hit by both Code Red and Nimda
> > immediately investigate alternatives to IIS, including moving Web
> > applications to Web server software from other vendors, such as iPlanet
and
> > Apache. Although these Web servers have required some security patches,
they
> > have much better security records than IIS and are not under active
attack
> > by the vast number of virus and worm writers. Gartner remains concerned
that
> > viruses and worms will continue to attack IIS until Microsoft has
released a
> > completely rewritten, thoroughly and publicly tested, new release of
IIS.
> > Sufficient operational testing should follow to ensure that the initial
wave
> > of security vulnerabilities every software product experiences has been
> > uncovered and fixed. This move should include any Microsoft .NET Web
> > services, which requires the use of IIS. Gartner believes that this
> > rewriting will not occur before year-end 2002 (0.8 probability).
> > Analytical Source: John Pescatore, Information Security Strategies"
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apache vs IIS
    ... Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I would chose IIS. ... Not that Apache is bad but ASP.NET is far easier and faster to create good web forms in. ... PHP on a IIS server is rather easy to run once you install PHP on a PC but if you only use PHP why not use Apache for Windows. ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Apache vs IIS
    ... Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I would chose ... Not that Apache is bad but ASP.NET is far easier and faster to ... IIS is designed for ASP, ... Apache running on a Linux server. ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Apache vs IIS
    ... my Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I would ... IIS is designed for ASP, ... can run asp on Apache, ... in running php from IIS vs Apache. ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Apache vs IIS
    ... on my Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I ... IIS is designed for ASP, ... you can run asp on Apache, ... PHP on a IIS server is rather easy to run once you install PHP on ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Apache vs IIS
    ... my Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I would chose IIS. ... Not that Apache is bad but ASP.NET is far easier and faster to create good web forms in. ... IIS is designed for ASP, ... PHP on a IIS server is rather easy to run once you install PHP on a PC but if you only use PHP why not use Apache for Windows. ...
    (alt.php)

Quantcast