Re: Friendly name not resolve?
From: Xiang Tu [MS] (xiangt@online.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/11/03
- Next message: Joe Pena: "Acces deny to administrator and systems accounts"
- Previous message: Andy Smith: "LDAP NullBase vulnerability"
- In reply to: Khoa Le: "Friendly name not resolve?"
- Next in thread: Khoa Le: "Re: Friendly name not resolve?"
- Reply: Khoa Le: "Re: Friendly name not resolve?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Xiang Tu [MS]" <xiangt@online.microsoft.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:40:53 -0800
On your new W2K Dc, what's the value of RestrictAnonymous registry key?
What members are in "Pre-Windows 2000 compatible access" group?
-- Xiang Tu [MS] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -- "Khoa Le" <khoa.le@pentagon.af.mil> wrote in message news:ezlWh4y5CHA.2416@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi all, > > I just upgrade my windows NT 4.0 PDC to WIN2K active directory (Mix mode)by > running the setup from win2k cd server. The upgrade process seem to be > successfully, domain account/password reserve OK. > > I have serveral WIN2K servers on the same subnet as the newly upgrade ADS > server. I just added those WIN2K servers to the Domain ADS. > > When trying to add the Domain global groups to each of the WIN2K servers's > local Administrators. Those global groups appear as the SID number instead > of the friendly name DOMAIN\globalGroups. > > How can I fix this problem? > > Thanks, > Khoa. > >
- Next message: Joe Pena: "Acces deny to administrator and systems accounts"
- Previous message: Andy Smith: "LDAP NullBase vulnerability"
- In reply to: Khoa Le: "Friendly name not resolve?"
- Next in thread: Khoa Le: "Re: Friendly name not resolve?"
- Reply: Khoa Le: "Re: Friendly name not resolve?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
