Re: LDAP and Single Sign On
From: Eric Chamberlain (eric_james_chamberlain@hotmail.com)
Date: 03/07/03
- Next message: Xiang Tu [MS]: "Re: Restricting abilities to create Trusts"
- Previous message: Raye Schwartz: "128-bit security not recognized by a website"
- In reply to: Harry Bates: "LDAP and Single Sign On"
- Next in thread: Harry Bates: "Re: LDAP and Single Sign On"
- Reply: Harry Bates: "Re: LDAP and Single Sign On"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Eric Chamberlain" <eric_james_chamberlain@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:02:27 -0800
LDAP is a directory access protocol, why use it to authenticate. If AD is
storing your user accounts and you are using Windows and unix clients, look
at using Kerberos.
"Harry Bates" <harry.bates@NOSPAMlmco.com> wrote in message
news:#63JBs$4CHA.1852@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Can I get some input on any single sign-on\LDAP solutions that you have
> implemented in the past the involve the following:
>
> W2K AD Domain houses the user accounts.
>
> Single sign on authentication need for the following using current AD user
> accounts:
>
> Linux (probably the easiest of all)
> Sun
> HP Unix
>
> We are currently looking into the up and coming iPlanet 5.2 and some other
> 3rd party authenticators. If you could give me some success and failure
> options I would be appreciative.
>
> -Harry Bates
> Lockheed-Martin
>
>
- Next message: Xiang Tu [MS]: "Re: Restricting abilities to create Trusts"
- Previous message: Raye Schwartz: "128-bit security not recognized by a website"
- In reply to: Harry Bates: "LDAP and Single Sign On"
- Next in thread: Harry Bates: "Re: LDAP and Single Sign On"
- Reply: Harry Bates: "Re: LDAP and Single Sign On"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
