Re: "Everyone group"
From: Daniel Billingsley (dbillingsley@NO.durcon.SPAAMM.com)
Date: 02/21/03
- Next message: Daniel Billingsley: "Re: Network Hacking"
- Previous message: Erick Thompson: "Folder redirection causing ACL/permissions to become corrupted?"
- In reply to: Shelton: ""Everyone group""
- Next in thread: Charles Braun: "Re: "Everyone group""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Daniel Billingsley" <dbillingsley@NO.durcon.SPAAMM.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:40:02 -0500
The built in group "Everyone" is the equivelant of Anonymous.
And Full permissions where? If you're talking about share permissions you
shouldn't be controlling access with that anyway, You can leave Everyone
there and set real NTFS permissions appropriate for what the folder
contains.
"Shelton" <renew@rconnect.com> wrote in message
news:01b901c2d9e0$68e90ac0$a201280a@phx.gbl...
> Hello,
>
> Is it necessary to leave the Everyone group with full
> permissions? What exactly is this group's function, and
> can it be removed entirely?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Shelton
- Next message: Daniel Billingsley: "Re: Network Hacking"
- Previous message: Erick Thompson: "Folder redirection causing ACL/permissions to become corrupted?"
- In reply to: Shelton: ""Everyone group""
- Next in thread: Charles Braun: "Re: "Everyone group""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|