Re: Network Hacking
From: Wombat (no.spam@wanted.here)
Date: 02/20/03
- Next message: Joe Terry: "Re: Win2k Pro in NT4.0 Domain Environment"
- Previous message: Lesley Greenway: "Server Security"
- In reply to: Vanguyver: "Network Hacking"
- Next in thread: Kevin Davisł: "Re: Network Hacking"
- Reply: Kevin Davisł: "Re: Network Hacking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Wombat" <no.spam@wanted.here> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:16:43 -0500
"Vanguyver" <vanguyver@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:058b01c2d919$e18450b0$2f01280a@phx.gbl...
> This same teacher is on a network committee to improve
> the network. Some way to improve the network!
Controlled attacks are a common - and effective - method within the industry
to verify security. This is why security firms get paid big bucks to
attempt to infiltrate networks (always with permission of course). Again,
the network admin should be required to take the course to learn what
attacks are possible and/or likely.
There were undoubtedly better ways to handle the situation - informing the
network admin(s) ahead of time would only be polite. Setting up a live fire
range would be even better as the attacks could be contained and holes could
be placed/patched as the course needed.
- Next message: Joe Terry: "Re: Win2k Pro in NT4.0 Domain Environment"
- Previous message: Lesley Greenway: "Server Security"
- In reply to: Vanguyver: "Network Hacking"
- Next in thread: Kevin Davisł: "Re: Network Hacking"
- Reply: Kevin Davisł: "Re: Network Hacking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|