Re: 3129 port- danger?
From: Don Grover (dgrover@assoft.com.au)
Date: 02/07/03
- Next message: Tom V.: "Cannot Install "Enterprise subordinate CA""
- Previous message: Ron Brierley: "Screensaver activation"
- In reply to: Ant: "Re: 3129 port- danger?"
- Next in thread: Ant: "Re: 3129 port- danger?"
- Reply: Ant: "Re: 3129 port- danger?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Don Grover" <dgrover@assoft.com.au> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:51:58 +1100
It but in the MORE selection, a bit buried , I use and love it to see if my
clients are connected.
Don
"Ant" <not@home.today> wrote in message
news:Oks2MVkzCHA.2668@TK2MSFTNGP12...
> "James Raaymakers MCSe" <jamesraa@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:02c001c2ce31$620c5550$d7f82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA14...
> > OOpps....wrong App. Here it is as an attachment.
>
> I can't believe you posted a 460k attachment to a
> non-binary newsgroup. However, I see this file is
> no longer on their web site. I'm wondering why.
>
>
- Next message: Tom V.: "Cannot Install "Enterprise subordinate CA""
- Previous message: Ron Brierley: "Screensaver activation"
- In reply to: Ant: "Re: 3129 port- danger?"
- Next in thread: Ant: "Re: 3129 port- danger?"
- Reply: Ant: "Re: 3129 port- danger?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|