Re: 2000 Server Internet Security
From: Jeff Cochran (jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com)
Date: 01/28/03
- Next message: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: NTLM specification"
- Previous message: Tom Jastrzebski: "Why User Settings in "Docounents and Settings" Get Deleted Uppon Logoff ?"
- In reply to: Danny: "2000 Server Internet Security"
- Next in thread: x y: "Re: 2000 Server Internet Security"
- Reply: x y: "Re: 2000 Server Internet Security"
- Reply: x y: "Re: 2000 Server Internet Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: jcochran.nospam@naplesgov.com (Jeff Cochran) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:39:43 GMT
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:55:59 -0800, "Danny" <dpoole@froggy.com.au>
wrote:
>How secure is a Win 2k Terminal Server and Domain
>Controller connected to the net via DSL 24/7.
Less secure than if it weren't connected...
>I have all web and ftp services stopped but wonder if i
>should be doing more to ensure security.
>
>A third party proxy/mail server is running also.
>
>Note I will also want 1 user to log into the TS via the
>net in 1 month or so.
Start here:
Pay attention to the hardening section.
Jeff
- Next message: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: NTLM specification"
- Previous message: Tom Jastrzebski: "Why User Settings in "Docounents and Settings" Get Deleted Uppon Logoff ?"
- In reply to: Danny: "2000 Server Internet Security"
- Next in thread: x y: "Re: 2000 Server Internet Security"
- Reply: x y: "Re: 2000 Server Internet Security"
- Reply: x y: "Re: 2000 Server Internet Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|