Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!
From: Joe Richards [MVP] (humorexpress@hotmail.com)
Date: 01/18/03
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Account has been Disabled by the Administrator"
- Previous message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Can Native Mode 2K Domains and NT4 Domains Trust Each Other?"
- In reply to: Rabbit: "Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!"
- Next in thread: Rabbit: "Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!"
- Reply: Rabbit: "Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@hotmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:31:01 -0500
Interesting, I will have to test that. That fix shouldn't have anything to
do with AdminSDHolder...
-- Joe Richards www.joeware.net --- "Rabbit" <rabbit@the.hutch> wrote in message news:OI%U9.127$E_3.1558@newsfep4-gui.server.ntli.net... > 327825 does it - or other Pre-SP4 hotfixes. This apparently is going to be > the behaviour in SP4... > > "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uTKlZ7YuCHA.2124@TK2MSFTNGP12... > > What hotfixes? > > > > -- > > Joe Richards > > www.joeware.net > > --- > > > > "Rabbit" <rabbit@the.hutch> wrote in message > > news:01%S9.3462$yi6.78052@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net... > > > Tried that - it just comes back on the next run. We've moved on > somewhat > > > since previously - the admincount value is also set as 1 on the actual > > GROUP > > > object as well and clearing that doesn't work either. We've found that > > the > > > problem also exists on the parallel test domain and have strong > suspicions > > > (in test at the moment) with regard to two hotfixes that are in place on > > > these domains, but not on any others, one of which has caused problems > in > > > the past. But that's another story... > > > > > > Thanks for your help and suggestions, though... > > > > > > "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:ejERKXttCHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP09... > > > > I don't know why it is happening but note that admincount is set to > 1... > > > > That means the account is supposed to be using the AdminSDHolder ACL. > > > > > > > > >adminCount: 1 > > > > > > > > Clear that value with script or ADSIEDIT and fix the ACL and it should > > > > remain. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > --- > > > > Joe Richards > > > > www.joeware.net > > > > --- > > > > "rabbit" <rabbit@the.hutch> wrote in message > > > > news:01eb01c2b576$88be81b0$8af82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA03... > > > > > Also seems to be happening now with Account Operators > > > > > group - sure this wasn't the case last week! > > > > > > > > > > Here's the info (this is after adminSDholder has run): > > > > > > > > > > E:\Support>adfind -b cn=users,dc=xxx,dc=yy,dc=zzz,dc=qqq - > > > > > f name="t-warren.test5" > > > > > > > > > > AdFind V01.09.00cpp Joe Richards (joe@joeware.net) > > > > > December 2002 > > > > > > > > > > Using server: <pdc role holder>.xxx.yyy.zzz.qqq > > > > > > > > > > dn:CN=t-warren.test5,CN=Users,DC=xxx,DC=yy,DC=zzz,DC=qqq > > > > > >memberOf: CN=Print > > > > > Operators,CN=Builtin,DC=xxx,DC=yy,DC=zzz,DC=qqq > > > > > >accountExpires: 9223372036854775807 > > > > > >adminCount: 1 > > > > > >badPasswordTime: 0 > > > > > >badPwdCount: 0 > > > > > >codePage: 0 > > > > > >cn: t-warren.test5 > > > > > >countryCode: 0 > > > > > >displayName: t-warren.test5 > > > > > >givenName: t-warren.test5 > > > > > >instanceType: 4 > > > > > >lastLogoff: 0 > > > > > >lastLogon: 0 > > > > > >logonCount: 0 > > > > > >distinguishedName: CN=t- > > > > > warren.test5,CN=Users,DC=xxx,DC=yy,DC=zzz,DC=qqq > > > > > >objectCategory: > > > > > CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=aaa,DC=bbb > > > > > pany,DC=co,DC=uk > > > > > >objectClass: top > > > > > >objectClass: person > > > > > >objectClass: organizationalPerson > > > > > >objectClass: user > > > > > >objectGUID: {527C46C0-5009-44D0-8FD9-8D37E3BC0BF0} > > > > > >objectSid: S-1-5-21-436374069-1637723038-725345543-3744 > > > > > >primaryGroupID: 513 > > > > > >pwdLastSet: 126863207433690294 > > > > > >name: t-warren.test5 > > > > > >sAMAccountName: t-warren.test5 > > > > > >sAMAccountType: 805306368 > > > > > >userAccountControl: 512 > > > > > >userPrincipalName: t-warren.test5@yyy.com > > > > > >uSNChanged: 1464151 > > > > > >uSNCreated: 1463856 > > > > > >whenChanged: 20030106104452.0Z > > > > > >whenCreated: 20030106095903.0Z > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Objects returned > > > > > > > > > > E:\Support>dsacls cn=t- > > > > > warren.test5,cn=users,DC=xxx,DC=yy,DC=zzz,DC=qqq > > > > > Access list: > > > > > {This object is protected from inheriting permissions > > > > > from the parent} > > > > > Effective Permissions on this object are: > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Administrators SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > DELETE > > > > > READ > > > > > PERMISSONS > > > > > WRITE > > > > > PERMISSIONS > > > > > CHANGE > > > > > OWNERSHIP > > > > > CREATE > > > > > CHILD > > > > > DELETE > > > > > CHILD > > > > > LIST > > > > > CONTENTS > > > > > WRITE > > > > > SELF > > > > > WRITE > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > LIST > > > > > OBJECT > > > > > CONTROL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > Allow NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > READ > > > > > PERMISSONS > > > > > LIST > > > > > CONTENTS > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > LIST > > > > > OBJECT > > > > > Allow xxx\Domain Admins SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > READ > > > > > PERMISSONS > > > > > WRITE > > > > > PERMISSIONS > > > > > CHANGE > > > > > OWNERSHIP > > > > > CREATE > > > > > CHILD > > > > > DELETE > > > > > CHILD > > > > > LIST > > > > > CONTENTS > > > > > WRITE > > > > > SELF > > > > > WRITE > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > LIST > > > > > OBJECT > > > > > CONTROL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > Allow aaa\Enterprise Admins SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > READ > > > > > PERMISSONS > > > > > WRITE > > > > > PERMISSIONS > > > > > CHANGE > > > > > OWNERSHIP > > > > > CREATE > > > > > CHILD > > > > > DELETE > > > > > CHILD > > > > > LIST > > > > > CONTENTS > > > > > WRITE > > > > > SELF > > > > > WRITE > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > LIST > > > > > OBJECT > > > > > CONTROL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > Allow NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM FULL > > > > > CONTROL > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS > > > > > READ > > > > > PERMISSONS > > > > > LIST > > > > > CONTENTS > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > LIST > > > > > OBJECT > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS for Remote Acce > > > > > ss Information > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS for General Inf > > > > > ormation > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS for Group Membe > > > > > rship > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS for Account Res > > > > > trictions > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > Allow BUILTIN\Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access SPECIAL > > > > > ACCESS for Logon Infor > > > > > mation > > > > > READ > > > > > PROPERTY > > > > > Allow Everyone Change > > > > > Password > > > > > > > > > > The command completed successfully > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > > >If you could, get a dump of one of the user accounts > > > > > with a problem with my > > > > > >adfind (www.joeware.net free win32 tools) and also with > > > > > dsacls and post it. > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > > >Joe Richards > > > > > >www.joeware.net > > > > > >--- > > > > > > > > > > > >"Rabbit" <rabbit@the.hutch> wrote in message > > > > > >news:TiSR9.488$Fm1.11686@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net... > > > > > >> Thanks for that - that was my thought and I will > > > > > verify it again. > > > > > >However, > > > > > >> the test accounts are new accounts with no AdminCount > > > > > >> set (checked with RepAdmin). They get secured by > > > > > adminSDHolder (I'll > > > > > >spell > > > > > >> it right this time!) on the first run after the > > > > > account is created and > > > > > >added > > > > > >> to one of the problem groups. The only group that > > > > > they are a member of > > > > > >(or > > > > > >> ever have been a member of) is Domain Users. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@hotmail.com> wrote > > > > > in message > > > > > >> news:emWwYhCtCHA.1628@TK2MSFTNGP10... > > > > > >> > Try clearing the AdminCount property of the account > > > > > in question that you > > > > > >> > don't want adminSDHolder overwriting. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > Joe Richards > > > > > >> > www.joeware.net > > > > > >> > --- > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > "Rabbit" <rabbit@the.hutch> wrote in message > > > > > >> > news:thBR9.1211$Gn6.18605@newsfep4- > > > > > gui.server.ntli.net... > > > > > >> > > Have just come across a problem with the > > > > > adminDSholder process which > > > > > >is > > > > > >> > > causing me some grief! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On our production domain, if I create a new user > > > > > (or copy an existing > > > > > >> one) > > > > > >> > > and add it to either the Server Operators or Print > > > > > Operators builtin > > > > > >> > domain > > > > > >> > > group, the account becomes secured by > > > > > adminDSholder (I have verified > > > > > >> this > > > > > >> > to > > > > > >> > > be case by modifying the permission set on > > > > > adminDSholder and seeing it > > > > > >> > then > > > > > >> > > propogate to the test accounts), along with other > > > > > higher-level admin > > > > > >> > > accounts. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > According to the (sparse) documentation I can find > > > > > on this, > > > > > >> adminDSholder > > > > > >> > > only secures Administrators, Domain > > > > > Administrators, Enterprise > > > > > >> > > Administrators and Schema Admins. I've tested > > > > > this on a freshly-built > > > > > >> > test > > > > > >> > > domain and the securing of Server Operators and > > > > > Print Operators > > > > > >doesn't > > > > > >> > > occur. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > This is a big headache for us as we run a custom > > > > > process to secure > > > > > >> > 'medium' > > > > > >> > > level admin accounts with our own ACLs - this is > > > > > now being overwritten > > > > > >> by > > > > > >> > > adminDSholder every hour. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Any ideas on why this is occuring and how we can > > > > > fix it...? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Account has been Disabled by the Administrator"
- Previous message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Can Native Mode 2K Domains and NT4 Domains Trust Each Other?"
- In reply to: Rabbit: "Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!"
- Next in thread: Rabbit: "Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!"
- Reply: Rabbit: "Re: adminDSholder being over zealous!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]