Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?
From: Joe Richards [MVP] (humorexpress@hotmail.com)
Date: 01/11/03
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Blocking the administrator account."
- In reply to: Tim Hines, MCSE [MVP]: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Next in thread: Kev: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Reply: Kev: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@hotmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 09:58:02 -0500
Note that some recent hot fixes change the urgent replication items. I think
MS is starting to realize that some of the security items all should have
been urgent replication. Also there is a hot fix coming out that will change
some of the password change functionality to a better system especially if
you use a large distributed environment with centralized management.
-- Joe Richards www.joeware.net --- "Tim Hines, MCSE [MVP]" <nupe009@carolina.rr.com> wrote in message news:UjJT9.34991$eB1.1467701@twister.southeast.rr.com... > Here's the low down. Read all of this > > Change Notification Between Sites > By default, changes are replicated between sites according to a schedule and > not according to when changes occur. For this reason, the greatest > replication latency across the forest is the sum of the greatest replication > latencies along the single longest replication path of any directory > partition. > > For special circumstances, you can configure change notifications on > connections between sites. By modifying the site link object, you can enable > change notification between sites for all connections that occur over that > link. Use ADSI Edit to enable change notification between sites. > > To enable change notification between sites > > 1.. In ADSI Edit, expand the Configuration container. > 2.. Navigate to the Inter-Site Transports container, and select CN=IP. > (You cannot enable change notification for SMTP links.) > 3.. Right-click the site link object for the sites for which you want to > enable change notification, and then click Properties. > 4.. In the Select a property to view box, select options. > 5.. In the Edit Attribute box, if the Value(s) box shows <not set>, type 1 > in the Edit Attribute box. If the Value(s) box contains a value, you must > derive the new value by using a Boolean BITWISE-OR calculation on the old > value, as follows: old_value BITWISE-OR 1. For example, if the value in the > Value(s) box is 2, calculate 0010 OR 0001 to equal 0011. Type the integer > value of the result in the Edit Attribute box; for this example, the value > is 3. > 6.. Click OK. > Enabling change notifications across site links propagates all change > notifications. With change notification between sites set, changes propagate > to the remote site with the same frequency that they are propagated within > the source site, including changes that warrant urgent replication. > > Note Do not enable change notification on demand-dial IP site links or on > SMTP site links. > > Urgent Replication > Urgent replication is implemented by immediately notifying replication > partners over RPC/IP that changes have occurred on a source domain > controller. Urgent replication uses regular change notification between > destination and source domain controller pairs that otherwise use change > notification, but notification is sent immediately in response to urgent > events instead of waiting the default period of five minutes. Therefore, if > you have change notification enabled on a site link, urgent replication is > possible between sites for events that trigger it. > > Events That Trigger Urgent Replication > Urgent Active Directory replication is always triggered by certain events on > all domain controllers within the same site. When you have enabled change > notification between sites, these triggering events also replicate > immediately between sites. > > Immediate replication between Windows 2000-based domain controllers in the > same site is prompted by the following: > > a.. Assigning an account lockout, which prohibits a user from logging on > after a certain number of failed attempts. > b.. Changing a Local Security Authority (LSA) secret, which is a secure > form in which private data is stored by the LSA. > c.. Change in the relative identifier (known as a "RID") master role > owner, which is the single domain controller in a domain that assigns > relative identifiers to all domain controllers in that domain. > Urgent Replication of Account Lockout Changes > Account lockout is a security feature that sets a limit on the number of > failed authentication attempts that are allowed before the account is > "locked out" from a further attempt to log on, in addition to a time limit > for how long the lockout is in effect. > > In Windows 2000, account lockout is urgently replicated to the primary > domain controller (PDC) emulator role owner and is then urgently replicated > to the following: > > a.. Domain controllers in the same domain that are located in the same > site as the PDC emulator. > b.. Domain controllers in the same domain that are located in the same > site as the domain controller that handled the account lockout. > c.. Domain controllers in the same domain that are located in sites that > have been configured to allow change notification between sites (and, > therefore, urgent replication) with the site that contains the PDC emulator > or with the site where the account lockout was handled. These sites include > any site that is included in the same site link as the site that contains > the PDC emulator or in the same site link as the site that contains the > domain controller that handled the account lockout. > In addition, when authentication fails at a domain controller other than the > PDC emulator, the authentication is retried at the PDC emulator. For this > reason, the PDC emulator locks the account before the domain controller that > handled the failed-password attempt if the bad-password-attempt threshold is > reached. For more information about how the PDC emulator role owner manages > password changes and account lockouts, see "Managing Flexible Single-Master > Operations" in this book. > > Managing Urgent Replication > The following guidelines can be useful when deciding whether to enable > change notification between sites relative to achieving urgent replication. > > a.. If you want urgent replication everywhere, put all domain controllers > for the specific domain in a single site (this option might not be > realistic). > b.. If you want urgent replication everywhere but still want the benefits > of site affinity, use multiple sites and enable change notification on all > site links. > c.. By default, a user lockout prompts urgent replication at the site that > contains the domain controller that handled the authentication and the site > that contains the PDC emulator role owner. > Forced Replication Between Two Servers > You can use a connection object to force replication from the inbound > server. In Active Directory Sites and Services, right-click a connection > object, and then click Replicate Now. For information about how to force > replication between two servers by using a connection object, see Windows > 2000 Server Help. For more information about forcing replication by using > other tools, see "Active Directory Diagnostics, Troubleshooting, and > Recovery" in this book. > > > -- > Tim Hines, MCSA, MCSE (2000 & NT4) > MVP - Active Directory > > > > > "Kev" <this-doesnt-exist@any-mailserver.com> wrote in message > news:#NzoA0MuCHA.432@TK2MSFTNGP10... > > Yesterday I discovered something that worries me. Here's the scenario: > > > > User JDOE was terminated from my company (let's say) ACME Corp. > > This user worked in one of ACME's offices overseas. This office is part > of > > the Active Directory Site 'B'. > > JDOE's account was disabled on a domain controller that also resides in > Site > > 'B'. > > Site 'A' has a VPN Server, and a domain controller. Site 'A' and Site 'B' > > use the DEFAULTIPSITELINK for replication. > > Now here's the kicker. The disabled user was still able to log onto the > > network at Site 'A' using VPN and had normal access to everything for a > > period of 3 hours! > > I realize that the replication interval for DEFAULTIPSITELINK is 180 > > minutes, but I assumed (wrongly)that an event such as disabling a user > would > > trigger a replication. > > > > Am I overlooking something? I don't think that I should have to force > > replication between all of my sites after an employee is terminated. I > also > > don't think that I should have to set the replication interval to such a > > small amount that it will possibly clog up the link. Any insights on this > > will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Kev > > > > > >
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Blocking the administrator account."
- In reply to: Tim Hines, MCSE [MVP]: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Next in thread: Kev: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Reply: Kev: "Re: AD intersite replication lag - security problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|