Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)
From: aaron (alklink@bellsouth.net)
Date: 01/03/03
- Next message: aaron: "Encryption"
- Previous message: Eric M: "Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)"
- In reply to: Eric M: "Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "aaron" <alklink@bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:00:07 -0800
I am totally against admin privelages for basic users but
it depends on what area you work in and what os you are
running. Some of my people are developers and have to have
full access to their machines, other users don't. Also
with XP you have to have local admin rights to do anything
on the stinkin machine. End solution give them admin privs
and you will end up working yourself to death trying to un-
install bonzo buddy and web shots because the end users
will load garabage on your machines and expect you to fix
them when they break.
>-----Original Message-----
>I am involved with a user group for a market specific
>application and we are currently discussing why not to
set
>up users with administrative rights. Can you beleive how
>many people find this an acceptable practice?
>
>I am a Network administrator and would never consider
this
>an option. What are your opinions? REPLY AND REPLY
>OFTEN. I feel this is a huge exposure that needs to be
>addressed.
>
>Thank you,
>Eric
>.
>
- Next message: aaron: "Encryption"
- Previous message: Eric M: "Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)"
- In reply to: Eric M: "Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)"
- Next in thread: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Permissions (EVERYONE POST TO THIS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|