Re: IPSEC Filter
From: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp (levinson_k@excite.com)
Date: 12/31/02
- Next message: Eric Fitzgerald [MSFT]: "Re: Account Unlock event not written to the eventlog"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Help with possible hacker..."
- In reply to: Toni Lassila: "Re: IPSEC Filter"
- Next in thread: Robin Twiggs: "Re: IPSEC Filter"
- Reply: Robin Twiggs: "Re: IPSEC Filter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Karl Levinson [x y] mvp" <levinson_k@excite.com> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:27:22 -0500
"Toni Lassila" <mpao@mc-europe.com> wrote in message
news:b11796dd.0212302318.2a4b51ae@posting.google.com...
> IP address space from 192 up was originally reserved for Class C type
> networks, i.e. /24. That means you can only have a netmask of
> 255.255.255.0 and need to have 71 different entries for each Class C
> network you want to cover in this case.
>
> Apparently someone at MS hasn't heard of CIDR, so you're SOL. This looks
> like it should be fixed in a SP.
>
> > Am I missing something here?
>
> No, but Windows definitely is.
I agree.
- Next message: Eric Fitzgerald [MSFT]: "Re: Account Unlock event not written to the eventlog"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: Help with possible hacker..."
- In reply to: Toni Lassila: "Re: IPSEC Filter"
- Next in thread: Robin Twiggs: "Re: IPSEC Filter"
- Reply: Robin Twiggs: "Re: IPSEC Filter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|