Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid
From: x y (levinson_k@excite.com)
Date: 12/06/02
- Next message: x y: "Re: is my machine hacked?"
- Previous message: al: "Re: Null Sessions - Restrict Anonymous"
- In reply to: Steven E. Adams: "IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Next in thread: Steven E. Adams: "Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Reply: Steven E. Adams: "Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Reply: Steven E. Adams: "Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "x y" <levinson_k@excite.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:13:29 -0500
I've heard of this happening before, and I'm not sure there is a fix. Be
sure you have the latest Windows service pack installed. You do have the
option probably of using the following subnets:
200.0.0.0 / 255.255.0.0
200.1.0.0 / 255.255.0.0
200.2.0.0 / 255.255.0.0
... etc. etc.
You can make this easier on yourself by scripting this using, for example,
the ipsecpol command line utility from Microsoft in a batch file.
Or, you could use a real firewall. That IMHO is even better, since IPsec
has no logging, alerting, intrusion detection, etc.
"Steven E. Adams" <stevea1@home2offic.com> wrote in message
news:06f801c29d69$b551f790$8af82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA03...
> I have looked at this article before posting...
> Traffic That Can--and Cannot--Be Secured by IPSec (253169)
>
>
> Using IPSEC, I can not enter these addresses in the "IP
> Filter List" to Filter ASIAN Networks:
>
> 200.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 203.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 211.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 212.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 213.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 218.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 219.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
>
> (I am sure there are more)
> I get an error "This is an invalid MASK for the specified
> IP Address"
>
> HOWEVER, When I enter in these IP Addresses, I DO NOT get
> an error:
>
> 61.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
> 80.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
>
>
> Is this a bug in the IPSEC Policy?
> Is there a patch?
> Am I doing something Wrong?
>
> UNIX & LINUX Firewall rules do this no problem, IPCHAINS,
> ETC... It would be great if Microsoft would get the IPSEC
> to work they way I would like to use it.
>
> Steven E. Adams
- Next message: x y: "Re: is my machine hacked?"
- Previous message: al: "Re: Null Sessions - Restrict Anonymous"
- In reply to: Steven E. Adams: "IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Next in thread: Steven E. Adams: "Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Reply: Steven E. Adams: "Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Reply: Steven E. Adams: "Re: IPSEC BUG - Cannot filter - Subnet Mask invalid"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|