Re: Prevent Word Pad from saving docs?

From: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp (levinson_k@excite.com)
Date: 11/22/02


From: "Karl Levinson [x y] mvp" <levinson_k@excite.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:44:14 -0500


Your post made me remember one other thing... if Windows was installed onto
a FAT partition and later converted to NTFS, the file permissions are not
secure and you will want to re-apply the default group policy templates.
I'm not positive, but the same thing could possibly be true if Windows 2000
was installed on a pre-existing NTFS partition such as if Windows NT or 2000
was already installed once on the system. More info:

http://securityadmin.info/faq.htm#4.42

"Jason Garms [MS]" <jasong@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:e02c01c29163$650177a0$89f82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA01...
> Hi Brandon,
>
> Karl's recommendation is definately on the right track.
> Also, it's worth noting that when you do a clean install
> of Win2k Pro on an NTFS file share, the file permissions
> are pretty well layed down (even better on WinXP Pro,
> which i'd strongly recommend using as well). You want to
> let the users logon using the Guest account, or as members
> of the guest group. One reason for this is when the user
> logs out, the system automatically removes the user's
> profile, which includes My Documents. This happens
> automatically for members of the guest group. I think
> there's a KB about this somewhere. You also want to make
> sure the INTERACTIVE pseudo-group is NOT a member of the
> local POWER USERS group. You can lock down further by
> removing it from the USERS group, but app compat will be
> even worse. However, if all you want to do is WordPad and
> print, this might not be an issue.
>
> good luck!
> -jasong
>
> Best,
> -jasong
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Briefly, I think the answer is Novell and Windows NTFS
> file permissions on
> >the files in question, and use the Group Policy MMC to
> lock down what the
> >users can see on the windows computers.
> >
> >Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen other third party
> software on, say, a
> >library kiosk that successfully monitored and blocked
> access to key
> >sensitive system files.... maybe Fortress isn't the only
> product you need?
> >Surely there must be other insecure public institutions
> that are doing the
> >same thing you are doing and can provide recommendations.
> >
> >"Brandon Brown" <blbrown@co.jefferson.co.us> wrote in
> message
> >news:c94801c290f0$badd95f0$8df82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA02...
> >> I'm overseeing a network using W2K Pro. (server & user)
> on
> >> a Novell 5.1 platform in a secure facility (jail) that
> has
> >> intentionally distructive users. I want to offer word
> >> processing and "Word Pad" seemed to be a good fit.
> User's
> >> must print their work prior to exiting program and our
> >> security software "Fortres Grand 4.1" works great for
> >> items on the desk top but does not prevent them from
> >> saving to the "C" or other drives when they are in Word
> >> Pad or other software programs. What's worse it even
> >> prompts them (Save window accessed when exiting and/or
> >> pulling down file/ "save" or "save as") that they can
> view
> >> and modify/delete server, Novell and system files. I
> have
> >> looked at making docs "read only" and even "hidden"
> files
> >> and "played" with other permissions/rights but these
> cause
> >> other programs not to operate properly.
> >> I have concluded that all word processing programs will
> >> ultimately end up offering the user the option / view of
> >> areas they can save their work to . . . which means
> death
> >> to my network.
> >> Does anyone know a way to make Word Pad docs only
> >> printable from the desktop ("save window/menu" does
> >> not "pop up" allowing modifification . . . or
> >> Change documents from Word Pad to "other format"
> (NotePad
> >> also has "pop up" save window) again allowing them to be
> >> placed on the desktop and only be printed but not
> >> modified.
> >
> >
> >.
> >



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Was XP as bad as this when it came out?
    ... the NTFS file system into mainstream usage which by most accounts ... introduced NTFS to mainstream usage. ... Windows 2000 was the first version of NT intended ... the winXP install CD to get to the "Press F8 to agree to the EULA" ...
    (uk.comp.homebuilt)
  • Re: Clean Install Windows XP
    ... > I got a Windows XP Home Original CD. ... > should I clean install XP or upgrade. ... I also wana convert to NTFS partition if its ... FAT32 vs NTFS.. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Re: Prevent Word Pad from saving docs?
    ... create a word processor that doesn't even allow opening or ... >a FAT partition and later converted to NTFS, ... true if Windows 2000 ... it's worth noting that when you do a clean install ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: XP-Pro: Unable to upgrade to SP3
    ... Reset the registry and the file permissions" ... Download the stand alone version of SP3. ... Windows Automatic Update screen in CP, ... When I try to install Windows Defender (under Genuine MS ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: uninstalling windows xp professional
    ... Almost certainly you should use NTFS. ... uninstall an operating system. ... install another operating system cleanly. ... Windows XP and revert to the previous operating system. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)