permission setup by Win2000 read by NT

From: Znews (syang@yahoo.com)
Date: 11/21/02


From: "Znews" <syang@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:25:09 -0500


Hi:

We have a few people we need to setup file/folder permission on a NTFS (on a
NT4 domain controller)
using Win2000 pro box.

But when we go back to change the permission on an NT server or workstation
box, it gives message saying the permission was setup by the Win2000 and ask
if we want to overwrite it

my questions is, most of our computers is NT4 boxes, so we need to be able
to read what permission was setup by those people who used win2000. Is
there an utility out there be able to run on a Win2K box and setup the
file/folder permission in a NT4-compatiable format so NT4s can read them?

BTW, What is the advantage of Win2K permisson if we are not using AD ?

Thanks
Z



Relevant Pages

  • Re: permission setup by Win2000 read by NT
    ... > We have a few people we need to setup file/folder permission on a NTFS (on ... > my questions is, most of our computers is NT4 boxes, so we need to be able ... > file/folder permission in a NT4-compatiable format so NT4s can read them? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: XP Accessibility feature saving profile
    ... > listed as Administrator, however cannot run regedit, or the like, but as I ... I have WRITTEN permission + if they refused to ... > way to restore it back to this way larger fonts/ color scheme etc without ... >> permissions on the setup or that you have an Administrator user account. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.accessibility)
  • Re: 2 Domains and Exchange 2003
    ... How did you setup the mailboxes exactly? ... > exchange server resides. ... > mailbox, it gives me permission errors. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity)
  • Re: 2 Domains and Exchange 2003
    ... >> 2003 setup wizard, I can specify the exchange server by name and enter the ... >> mailbox, it gives me permission errors. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity)
  • Re: Re: /dev/lp0 rights and CUPS
    ... I am no expert on udeb permission rules but that looks to me like you want ... the owner *and* group set to lp, ... looks like on my setup as well. ... I guess I wasn't clear in my previous post, the changes I made to udev.permissions did *not* change the owner from root to lp on the next boot. ...
    (Debian-User)