Re: L2TP via PIX
From: menard 242622 (menard@stanleyaviation.com)
Date: 11/14/02
- Next message: Jeff Doty: "Restricting users to a single logon"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: problem with the application .exe"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: L2TP via PIX"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: L2TP via PIX"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: L2TP via PIX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "menard 242622" <menard@stanleyaviation.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:57:37 -0700
i'm trying to use the L2TP ports for VPN
the PPTP ports are working fine, and i can L2TP connect, but only inside the
PIX firewall
i'll try the 50 and 51 per your doc and let you know.
thanks
mike
"Keith W. McCammon" <km@km.com> wrote in message
news:Org6ofAjCHA.2428@tkmsftngp10...
> > i can find plenty of info, mostly from cisco on how to set up PIX (our
> > firewall) to accept L2TP vpn, but i would like to do it thru the pix to
> our
> > current PPTP server. works fine if you are inside the PIX, but times out
> > from the outside
> > regular vpn works just fine. have tried port 1701 tcp and udp, and 500
> but
> > still no joy. i know it says NAT and ipsec don't work together, but
> thought
> > that was fixed on XP ??
>
> You're typing to use the L2TP ports for PPTP...
>
> http://mccammon.org/articles/vpn_faq.php#Q006
>
>
- Next message: Jeff Doty: "Restricting users to a single logon"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp: "Re: problem with the application .exe"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: L2TP via PIX"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: L2TP via PIX"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: L2TP via PIX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|