Re: security paradox
From: Joe Richards [MVP] (humorexpress@hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/02
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Look for utility to check password expiry"
- Previous message: Neo: "Re: SSL"
- In reply to: Greg Lorriman: "security paradox"
- Next in thread: flex: "Re: security paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Joe Richards [MVP]" <humorexpress@hotmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:02:27 -0400
If the data is that sensitive it should be encrypted with PGP or some other
third party encryption package that being an administrator doesn't allow
access to.
-- --- Joe Richards www.joeware.net --- "Greg Lorriman" <temp@lorriman.com> wrote in message news:OCtPetlZCHA.3736@tkmsftngp08... > > I'm the admin on a small network. I have admin rights on the NT box and all > the attached computers. This allows me access to very sensitive information. > I don't want access to that information. > > In order to avoid this problem I get a "Server Operator" account, and the > admin password is changed and only known to the managing director. The > managing director is not technical, but is capable of typing the password as > needed, with a 3rd person to act as a "chaperone" during any period that > admin access is needed by myself. > > However this system is unworkable since admin access is required more > frequently than anticipated; the MD is constantly being troubled and the 3rd > person is fed up and bored. > > How is this conundrum usually dealt with? AFAICS admin access is too > powerful, and I don't know of a "step down" that will allow server > administration while disallowing user folder access. > > This must be a nightmare in a large network with multiple admins. > > The system to which I refer is an NT server with win2k clients. The info to > which I am referring is that which newspapers would be interested in and so > this conundrum and a need for a solution is causing myself and my boss some > anxiety. It's not so much that I can't trust myself, but that there is no > real reason why the persons effected by this security issue should trust me, > and nor anyone who might replace me. There's is also the issue of leak > detection : by having just one individual with the admin password restricts > accountability somewhat. If an enquiry were launched into a breach of > security myself and my boss want to be as protected as possible. > > Anyone got more of a clue than we have? > > A decent book recommendation would be lovely too! > > Greg > > > > >
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Look for utility to check password expiry"
- Previous message: Neo: "Re: SSL"
- In reply to: Greg Lorriman: "security paradox"
- Next in thread: flex: "Re: security paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|