security paradox
From: Greg Lorriman (temp@lorriman.com)
Date: 09/27/02
- Next message: Torgeir Bakken: "Re: Q323172 - xenroll.cab File"
- Previous message: John McCoy: "CA Servers and Windows 98"
- Next in thread: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: security paradox"
- Reply: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: security paradox"
- Reply: flex: "Re: security paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Greg Lorriman" <temp@lorriman.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:24:07 +0100
I'm the admin on a small network. I have admin rights on the NT box and all
the attached computers. This allows me access to very sensitive information.
I don't want access to that information.
In order to avoid this problem I get a "Server Operator" account, and the
admin password is changed and only known to the managing director. The
managing director is not technical, but is capable of typing the password as
needed, with a 3rd person to act as a "chaperone" during any period that
admin access is needed by myself.
However this system is unworkable since admin access is required more
frequently than anticipated; the MD is constantly being troubled and the 3rd
person is fed up and bored.
How is this conundrum usually dealt with? AFAICS admin access is too
powerful, and I don't know of a "step down" that will allow server
administration while disallowing user folder access.
This must be a nightmare in a large network with multiple admins.
The system to which I refer is an NT server with win2k clients. The info to
which I am referring is that which newspapers would be interested in and so
this conundrum and a need for a solution is causing myself and my boss some
anxiety. It's not so much that I can't trust myself, but that there is no
real reason why the persons effected by this security issue should trust me,
and nor anyone who might replace me. There's is also the issue of leak
detection : by having just one individual with the admin password restricts
accountability somewhat. If an enquiry were launched into a breach of
security myself and my boss want to be as protected as possible.
Anyone got more of a clue than we have?
A decent book recommendation would be lovely too!
Greg
- Next message: Torgeir Bakken: "Re: Q323172 - xenroll.cab File"
- Previous message: John McCoy: "CA Servers and Windows 98"
- Next in thread: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: security paradox"
- Reply: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: security paradox"
- Reply: flex: "Re: security paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|