Re: Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)
From: Jim Campau (Jim_Campau@bausch.com)
Date: 09/18/02
- Next message: Jim Campau: "Re: Dropfolder security"
- Previous message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Migration from Novell to 2000"
- In reply to: Mowgus: "Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)"
- Next in thread: Greg Askew: "Re: Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)"
- Reply: Greg Askew: "Re: Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Jim Campau" <Jim_Campau@bausch.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:58:13 -0400
Install the Certificate Authority and require certificates to logon to a
session. There is a few parts to setting this up so do your research, I can
not walk you through it.
"Mowgus" <mdubois@london.ca> wrote in message
news:1b6501c25f18$2d7b14d0$2ae2c90a@phx.gbl...
> We currently use NetOp for remote administration simply
> because it is more secure than TS. You have to a) have
> the client software which you can't just get anywhere and
> b) you have to have a login and password to even make a
> connection to the server which is not your NT login. This
> makes for a more secure environment.
>
> But, we'd like to use Terminal Services because of the
> obvious cost savings. Has anyone heard of a way to make
> Terminal Services more secure by preventing connections
> that are not authorized?
>
> Cheers~!
> M.
- Next message: Jim Campau: "Re: Dropfolder security"
- Previous message: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Migration from Novell to 2000"
- In reply to: Mowgus: "Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)"
- Next in thread: Greg Askew: "Re: Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)"
- Reply: Greg Askew: "Re: Higher Terminal Services Security (RA)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
