Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?
From: George Hester (hesterloli@hotmail.com)
Date: 09/02/02
- Next message: George Hester: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Previous message: SEAN LAI: "DNS Problem on 2000 Server AD"
- In reply to: blink: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Next in thread: blink: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Reply: blink: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 23:01:33 -0400
"but one likely candidate seems to be that it's in one of the recent
Microsoft service
packs. I sure didn't install anything other than the urgent SP's from
Windows update, including Win2K sp3." (c) - Saturday, August 31, 2002 12:57
PM blink blink@blink.com
-- George Hester ______________________________ "blink" <blink@blink.com> wrote in message news:MPG.17dc65831289efdd98974e@msnews.microsoft.com... > George, you're obviously committed to distorting what I say. From the > original post onwards, I've said that it's either in a MS patch OR there > is a vulnerability that this is allowing it to be installed via IE or > whatever. I don't know by what method FirstLook.com and Net.Net were > able to get so far into my machine, but since I've not downloaded > anything recently from the net, other than the MS patches, those are the > only two options I can see. Maybe there is a third option; can someone > suggest one? Fine, I would just like to know what happened. > > I wanted to ask someone who knew something about it, not someone like > yourself that just cannot imagine a Microsoft product that has a > vulnerability, or that it's possible that MS might have had a patch > hacked, or... whatever, just continue with your worship of Microsoft, > and you'll feel fine about everything, I'm sure. > > I also noted in one of my other posts to you that these two garbage > programs were installed on my machine after I used Windows Update to get > 3com Net Driver Version 4.16.0.0, so it may have nothing to do with > win2k sp3. Apparently you didn't read it, or didn't care. > > Here is a quote for you from the thread I pointed to in my original > post: "This started happening after downloading IE 6.0 last week. I'm a > Microsoft supporter, but agree this is criminal behavior and whomever > did this should be punished -- the virus analogy is right on." Whatever > the source, it's disturbing a number of people because something is > going on that, at least to the people who have reported it, hasn't been > seen before. A pointer to that thread again: > > http://www.computing.net/networking/wwwboard/forum/8981.html > > I make my living programming with Microsoft products. I'm not into > bashing them; but I sure as heck know that they aren't perfect. And what > I'm trying to draw some attention to is that FirstLook.com and New.Net > have found a way to install their rubbish on pc's without anyones > permission. > > In article <uK0zkDYUCHA.2684@tkmsftngp08>, hesterloli@hotmail.com > says... > > You are determined to believe that Microsoft gave it to you. That is fine. > > You will get it again I am sure. Not from Microsoft but hey if that's where > > you think it came from then Oh boy you have the inside scoop on > > FirstLook.com. I am not an expert on what gets installed by ServicePack 3 > > but don't you think something so obvious as a Popup after installing that > > Service Pack would have been reported by at least one soul in the 15,000,000 > > people that have installed it? No? > > > > -- > > George Hester > > ______________________________ > > "blink" <blink@blink.com> wrote in message > > news:MPG.17dae6fe7a113cb098974b@msnews.microsoft.com... > > > I guess you have the inside scoop on the service packs, as you're so > > > unequivocal about it. > > > > > > And I agree with you, if they did install it themselves, MS should > > > "maybe consider making some security enhancements that give us better > > > control over this type of thing." You said their response would be "we > > > do", which I can't make any sense of, but whatever. > > > > > > > > > In article <O6c6H4RUCHA.3924@tkmsftngp12>, hesterloli@hotmail.com > > > says... > > > > Hocum. It is not put in by a Microsoft Service pack. You picked it up > > in > > > > your Web browsing behavior. I sure hope that Microsoft does NOT do > > anything > > > > about it other then maybe making some security enhancements that give us > > > > better control over this type of thing. But their response would be, > > "we > > > > do!." > > > > > > > > -- > > > > George Hester > > > > ______________________________ > > > > "blink" <blink@blink.com> wrote in message > > > > news:MPG.17da95625cb50971989748@msnews.microsoft.com... > > > > > Quite a number of people are getting a mysterious application > > installed > > > > > by a company called FirstLook.com without their foreknowledge or > > > > > permission. It is getting installed as a application, and is listed in > > > > > the control panel Add/Remove Programs section as "FirstLook Portal". > > > > > Each day when an infected machine is started, IE opens and displays > > > > > their ad. People have reported difficulty in uninstalling it; other > > > > > programs getting disabled; and data being transmitted over broadband > > > > > connections when it appears. > > > > > > > > > > There is a thread here discussing the FirstLook.com invasion: > > > > > http://www.computing.net/networking/wwwboard/forum/8981.html
- Next message: George Hester: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Previous message: SEAN LAI: "DNS Problem on 2000 Server AD"
- In reply to: blink: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Next in thread: blink: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Reply: blink: "Re: FirstLook.com pop-up application; installed via SP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|