Re: Workstation only security limitations
From: Alex Anderson (AAnderson@Murrieta.org)
Date: 07/31/02
- Next message: Matt: "Re: Check security, how?"
- Previous message: roy: "Re: W2K Authenticating to NT 4.0 Domain Not working...."
- In reply to: Karl [x y]: "Re: Workstation only security limitations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Alex Anderson" <AAnderson@Murrieta.org> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:46:23 -0700
Karl,
Makes sense, thanks.
"Karl [x y]" <jamescagney90210@excite.com> wrote in message
news:#sZC0F2NCHA.2648@tkmsftngp11...
> "Alex Anderson" <AAnderson@Murrieta.org> wrote in message
> news:O0wvPr0NCHA.2604@tkmsftngp11...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering what are the limitations I'll be facing if I
> > want to lock down a Windows 2000 workstation vs Windows 2000 group
policy
> > objects? Using the local security on a workstation, will I be able to
> lock
> > down the workstation to the point when a specific user logs he/she won't
> be
> > able to access certain resources like the C drive for example?
>
> To the best of my knowledge, local and domain group policies both have
more
> or less the same options and settings. The main advantage to setting
group
> policies via active directory is the ability to remotely and uniformly
> manage a large number of workstations.
>
>
>
- Next message: Matt: "Re: Check security, how?"
- Previous message: roy: "Re: W2K Authenticating to NT 4.0 Domain Not working...."
- In reply to: Karl [x y]: "Re: Workstation only security limitations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|