Re: IPSec Filter Question
From: karl [x y] (jamescagney90210@excite.com)
Date: 07/31/02
- Next message: karl [x y]: "Re: Security Log Display"
- Previous message: karl [x y]: "Re: Users and Power Users in W2k... installation matters"
- In reply to: Jason Marks: "IPSec Filter Question"
- Next in thread: Brian Komar: "Re: IPSec Filter Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "karl [x y]" <jamescagney90210@excite.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:59:37 -0400
I prefer to use third party software instead of Windows IPsec to block
packets, as there's no logging, which to me is critical when
troubleshooting, detecting intrusions and [ha ha] prosecuting intruders.
"Jason Marks" <nospam@please.com> wrote in message
news:DnG19.82712$Og3.22041502@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have an internal webserver running on Win2k Pro. I have set the port to
> serve up on 785. I want to use IPSec filters to not only block all access
to
> this server (except from one box), but also to encrypt all of the
> communications between the webserver and the one computer.
>
> I was able to one or the other, but not both at the same time.
>
> Here is a summary of what I am trying to say-
> 1. Block everyone except 10.0.0.15
> 2. Only allow 10.0.0.15 to connect to 785 and nothing else
> 3. Use IPSec to encrypt the traffic between the two
>
> Both are Win2k Pro boxes.
>
> This should be possible, right? Am I overlooking something simple? Any
help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
- Next message: karl [x y]: "Re: Security Log Display"
- Previous message: karl [x y]: "Re: Users and Power Users in W2k... installation matters"
- In reply to: Jason Marks: "IPSec Filter Question"
- Next in thread: Brian Komar: "Re: IPSec Filter Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|