Re: Where should security exist?
From: Shawn (Shawn@noemail.com)
Date: 07/24/02
- Next message: MSS: "Disable Logon"
- Previous message: sean: "Palm Pilot in W2k"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Where should security exist?"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Where should security exist?"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Where should security exist?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Shawn" <Shawn@noemail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:00:06 -0700
Even if all the data was being saved on the servers,
wouldn't you still risk the fact that a user can download
and run some program that can comprise the security of
the entire network.
I am just thinking, if over 70% of the companies that get
hacked, get hacked from within their organization, why
would it be a bad practice to harden the security on
workstations as well the servers.
The article I read was written by someone who said was a
consultant for Pricewaterhouse.
>-----Original Message-----
>> I was wondering, can someone tell me, should you or
>> should you not secure workstations in a enterprise?
>
>Depends on the enterprise, and the security policies
that exist. Network
>security is just policy enforcement.
>
>> I was reading an article the other day, and it said
that,
>> hardening security on workstations in an "enterprise",
is
>> not a good thing to do. It is best practice to secure
the
>> servers as well as all the incoming and outgoing lines
to
>> or from your network to outside.
>>
>> Is this statement true? Why or why not..
>
>Again, this depends. If the value placed on the data on
the workstations is
>(or could be) of significant value, then you'd better be
enforcing some type
>of security policy at the desktop. If there's nothing
of value, then you
>may be fine just updating AV signatures regularly and
distributing critical
>patches only. It's all relative to the general policies
in place. If the
>article did indeed phrase their comments this way, then
the article is
>over-generalizing, and is wrong. Don't believe
everything you read!
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: MSS: "Disable Logon"
- Previous message: sean: "Palm Pilot in W2k"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Where should security exist?"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Where should security exist?"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: Where should security exist?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|