Re: uuuhhh
From: DumbAss (x_convict@hotmail.com)
Date: 07/18/02
- Next message: DumbAss: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Previous message: Matt Kucenski: "Security Configuration and Analysis Tool shows wrong permissions on registry entries"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Next in thread: DumbAss: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Reply: DumbAss: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "DumbAss" <x_convict@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 23:02:21 +1000
The actual address range is 0.0.0.0 to 0.255.255.254
Would that be any help
<jcochran at naplesgov dot com (Jeff Cochran)> wrote in message
news:3d46fc19.213053074@news.supernews.com...
> >Can you tell me how to enter these IPs into the RRAS input and output
> >filters, please?
> >
> >0.0.0.0/8
> >
> >Can't put it in without RRAS saying ANY address with a 8 bit mask
>
> That's because the address you're entering will block any address with
> an 8 bit mask. :)
>
> You don't want to use 0.0.0.0. You want the actual address range
> you're blocking.
>
> Jeff
- Next message: DumbAss: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Previous message: Matt Kucenski: "Security Configuration and Analysis Tool shows wrong permissions on registry entries"
- In reply to: Jeff Cochran: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Next in thread: DumbAss: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Reply: DumbAss: "Re: uuuhhh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
