Re: Releasing IP Address
From: Phil M (abuse@mail.com)
Date: 06/30/02
- Next message: kthyboy: "Re: Windows 2000 Professional"
- Previous message: Tennessee: "SSL seems unavailable"
- In reply to: wyerd: "Re: Releasing IP Address"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Phil M" <abuse@mail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 16:29:24 GMT
If the printer responds to an arp request over the wire faster than your
firewall, then its MAC address will be used for the IP addy..
As suggested in another reply, you can manually force a MAC->IP
method, as long as all the machines are on the same subnet..
OR, you can try to 'slow down' the printer's response to ARP
requests... maybe bury it behind a half dozen store-and-forward switches :)
Phil
"wyerd" <wyerdl@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1162701c21e94$0eb76bd0$a4e62ecf@tkmsftngxa06...
> Ah, to be in the corporate world. But unfortunately this
> is county politics. Each agency has its own elected
> official and IS dept. The Commission as the distributor
> of money mandated one central network. Elected officials
> protested and the compromise was four independent networks
> each connected to my hub, but individually managed. I
> have all IP addresses posted on our support site so each
> department can check such things, but arrogance runs
> high. I do not know how an IBM printer can take priority
> over a firewall at the server, but when they assigned it
> the same IP, it dominated. I can direct connect to my
> firewall and change the IP, but that doesn't resolve my
> root problem of controlling the assignment of IP addresses
> by other agencies. Ideally what I need is a way to ban a
> MAC address from accessing with any IP address.
- Next message: kthyboy: "Re: Windows 2000 Professional"
- Previous message: Tennessee: "SSL seems unavailable"
- In reply to: wyerd: "Re: Releasing IP Address"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|