Re: SSL 2 and SSLV 3
From: avgreen (avgreen@rcnchicago.com)
Date: 06/29/02
- Next message: konstantinos fragkos: "Low security on windows 2000?"
- Previous message: x y: "Re: remote account adminitration"
- In reply to: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: SSL 2 and SSLV 3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "avgreen" <avgreen@rcnchicago.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 22:05:34 -0700
By viewing the certificate, I was able to see in props
that it was in fact v3.
>-----Original Message-----
>CA has very little to do with SSL... What makes you
thinking so?
>
>--
>Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP, MCSE
>-= F1 is the key =-
>
>"Ada Green" <avgreen@rcnchicago.com> wrote in message
>news:1222401c21965$a5112230$35ef2ecf@TKMSFTNGXA11...
>> Does anyone know which is used for MS Certificate
services?
>> I did a little bit of reading and am under the suspicion
>> that SSL 2.0 is for non enterprise CAs.
>>
>> Is this the case?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ada
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: konstantinos fragkos: "Low security on windows 2000?"
- Previous message: x y: "Re: remote account adminitration"
- In reply to: S. Pidgorny [MVP]: "Re: SSL 2 and SSLV 3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]