Re: user permissions
- From: Ola Hallengren <OlaHallengren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:01 -0700
Another option is to mark a database (e.g. master) as trustworthy and create
a stored procedure WITH EXECUTE AS OWNER.
Erland Sommarskog has an article on his web site about this.
http://www.sommarskog.se/grantperm.html
Ola Hallengren
http://ola.hallengren.com
"Charles Wang[MSFT]" wrote:
Hi Ola,.
Thanks for your response.
My appologies for not carefully testing this, yes, you are right.
IMPERSONATE permission must be granted on the login account with sysadmin
and processadmin to the limited login account.
Best regards,
Charles Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
=========================================================
Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your
comments and suggestions about how we can improve the
support we provide to you. Please feel free to let my manager
know what you think of the level of service provided. You can
send feedback directly to my manager at: msdnmg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
=========================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=========================================================
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: user permissions
- From: Charles Wang[MSFT]
- Re: user permissions
- References:
- user permissions
- From: Trapulo
- Re: user permissions
- From: Uri Dimant
- Re: user permissions
- From: Trapulo
- Re: user permissions
- From: Charles Wang[MSFT]
- Re: user permissions
- From: Ola Hallengren
- Re: user permissions
- From: Charles Wang[MSFT]
- Re: user permissions
- From: Ola Hallengren
- Re: user permissions
- From: Charles Wang[MSFT]
- Re: user permissions
- From: Charles Wang[MSFT]
- user permissions
- Prev by Date: Re: Restricting Access priviledge on SQL2000
- Next by Date: Re: Trace File with null time SQL2000
- Previous by thread: Re: user permissions
- Next by thread: Re: user permissions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|