Re: An issue with SQL 2005 and Kerberos...
- From: "Russell Fields" <russellfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:12:31 -0500
Camilo,
Very glad to hear that you were able to get it worked out.
RLF
"Camilo" <Camilo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FA74B8C8-3004-41C5-B4C4-EE68B6471013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you Rusell!
At the en it was an SPN issue. They were not duplicate but htey were setup
wrong.
The first issue was that they were using the wrong FQDN, pointing to a DNS
alias that was not the physucal host and the second issue was that the
they
were including the instance name in the FQDN.
Once again,
Thanks!
Camilo
.
- References:
- An issue with SQL 2005 and Kerberos...
- From: Camilo
- Re: An issue with SQL 2005 and Kerberos...
- From: Russell Fields
- An issue with SQL 2005 and Kerberos...
- Prev by Date: Re: DBReindex
- Next by Date: Re: encrypted value storage
- Previous by thread: Re: An issue with SQL 2005 and Kerberos...
- Next by thread: Re: log connection to named pipe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|