Re: General permission question
- From: "Uri Dimant" <urid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:45:04 +0200
Hi
It is because he has DENY permission on that table and it overrides
UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE. Take a look at application role in the BOL
"Snowmizer" <Snowmizer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E734951E-921A-4760-98B9-45497F835A6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here's my scenario:
I have a user in my Active Directory. This user is a part of two different
groups in AD. These AD groups have a logon in my SQL Server 2005 database.
These two groups both have rights to a particular table in my database.
One
group has select only rights and the other has select, insert, update
rights
on the same table.
I have an application that is accessing this table (updating data in the
table). When my user tries to run this application they are getting a
message
that they don't have "Update" permissions on the table. This despite the
fact
that even though they are a member of the group that only has select
permissions they are also a member of the group that has select, insert,
and
update permissions.
I also have this same scenario on my SQL Server 2000 database and things
work fine.
My explanation for this is that SQL Server 2005 uses "most restrictive
permissions win". Is this accurate?
Thanks.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: General permission question
- Next by Date: Re: NT Authority\networkservice failed to connect
- Previous by thread: Re: General permission question
- Next by thread: Re: General permission question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|