Re: db_owner
- From: "zz12" <IDontLikeSpam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:56:17 -0800
Thanks for your speedy confirmation Dan. Much appreciated :-)
"Dan Guzman" <guzmanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:26708F07-A4D5-41EB-BDE9-169A201295A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, db_owner will pretty much give the consultant full control but only
within that database.
--
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"zz12" <IDontLikeSpam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e5sNUtgNIHA.5860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello. What would be the best role assignment for a temporary consultant
to access one of our user created databases on our sql2k server to allow
this person to develop freely but only within this database and not any
of our other databases including the obvious system databases? Would it
be ok to give this consultant a windows domain login and assign it as a
db_owner or would assigning a combination of the other system roles
within this db be better?
Thanks in advance.
.
- References:
- db_owner
- From: zz12
- db_owner
- Prev by Date: db_owner
- Next by Date: Error when connect to sql server 2005 using remote desktop
- Previous by thread: db_owner
- Next by thread: Re: db_owner
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|