Re: SQL Logins vs Windows Authentication

Richard Mueller [MVP] (rlmueller-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
I have a VB6 app that uses an SQL Server database. The application uses
Windows Authentication to connect to the database. Permissions in the
database are granted to a domain group. I am considering having the
application hosted. The hosting company says they are configured for SQL
authentication and cannot allow Windows Authentication for security
reasons. They use SQL Server 2005 (cluster). This puzzles me. The users
running my app will have Active Directory accounts in the hosting
company's domain. What security reasons could there be? I hesitate to
code SQL Login names and passwords in my application.

Not that I have much experience about hosting scenarios, but I would
expect a company that hosts SQL Server to provide SQL authentication
only, of the simple reason that they would accept to add external users
to their own domain. You say that this is actually happening, but I guess
the hosting company has several domains. I mean, your customers will not
be in the same domain as the hosting company's own domain, but they will
create a specific domain for your customers, and that only your customers
can access. If the SQL Server instance is not in that domain, we are
back in the situation where SQL authentication will be required.

How would you customers log into the domain at the hosting company?


--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SQL Logins vs Windows Authentication
    ... Windows Authentication to connect to the database. ... The hosting company says they are configured for SQL ... They use SQL Server 2005. ... I mean, your customers will not ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
  • Re: good hosting company for a developer please
    ... Your limited to creating 2 SQL server ... > I am looking for a good hosting company. ... Which implies developments on ASP. ... > and they work 100% okay, I would then offer my services to customers ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Windows Authentication in asp.net 2005 to SQL Server?
    ... If the domains do not trust each other, Windows authentication is not going ... Basic authentication sometimes makes the need for Kerberos delegation go ... generic account to do the backend data stuff on our SQL Server. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.security)
  • Re: I dont want to re-invent the Login/Login Wheel - Help with utilities
    ... Yes, if you use .NET1.1, there isn't built-in login control, and more importanltly there isn't ready-to-use membership component to use. ... the membership provider uses SQL Server or SQL Server Express. ... We feel that having the capability to force password change would be a better benefit in securing our application and data access. ... Both Windows authentication and authorization wolud be be fine if we wanted the world to have access to our application data, but not very intuitive for maintaining integrity over our data. ...
    (microsoft.public.vstudio.general)
  • RE: IIS (ASP) -> SQLServer Authentication Issue
    ... I understand that you'd like to use IIS Intergration authentication in the ... and ASP "impersonates" authencitaed users to access SQL Server on ... only kerberos authentication allows double-hops from clients ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)