Re: application roles and strong passwords
- From: rjvanzanten <rvanzant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Apr 2007 05:49:03 -0700
Thanks Sue, I know that a better password would be preferred. But its
a difficult option for us.
Thanks for the tip on the sp_addapprole. It should get us through
this.
Ron
On Apr 16, 11:26 pm, Sue Hoegemeier <S...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes...they should all be strong passwords. Using strong
passwords would be the first option.
If for some reason you can't and need time until you can use
strong passwords, One way around it is to use the old stored
procedures which are only there for backwards compatibility.
sp_addapprole, sp_approlepassword, etc.
-Sue
On 16 Apr 2007 18:15:02 -0700, rjvanzanten
<rvanz...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
we are testing upgrading an application to run SQL 2005. One issue we
are having is that the one application role they have has a 'weak'
password. We are trying to change the password and it seem to be
inforcing the 'strong password policy from windows. I cannot see a way
around this. Do all application roles need strong passwords? Is there
any way around it?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- References:
- application roles and strong passwords
- From: rjvanzanten
- Re: application roles and strong passwords
- From: Sue Hoegemeier
- application roles and strong passwords
- Prev by Date: Re: Do Windows Authentication SQL 2k5 Logins survive a sysprep?
- Next by Date: Re: ist of Databases: do not use master.dbo.sysdatabases...
- Previous by thread: Re: application roles and strong passwords
- Next by thread: Re: application roles and strong passwords
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|