RE: Security role problem
- From: weilu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Wei Lu [MSFT])
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:31:51 GMT
Hello Tore,
You don't need to grant the update permission on the table for the security
role. You could deny the update permission to the table and grant the
Execute permission on the stored procedure. So that the security role could
only update the table by using the stored procedure.
Hope this will be helpful.
Sincerely,
Wei Lu
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
==================================================
(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Security role problem
- From: Wei Lu [MSFT]
- RE: Security role problem
- References:
- Security role problem
- From: Tore G.
- Security role problem
- Prev by Date: Re: owned schema or role members?
- Next by Date: Re: owned schema or role members?
- Previous by thread: Security role problem
- Next by thread: RE: Security role problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
