Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: "Uri Dimant" <urid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:17:17 +0200
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=555017
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/downloads/default.mspx
"Not Me" <Not.Me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166532551.477926@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hmmm, it is already in mixed-mode.
Any other ideas?
cheers,
Chris
"Uri Dimant" <urid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e1vPDJ2IHHA.4712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes. you can changed it and re-connict again
"Not Me" <Not.Me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166527936.903888@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Uri Dimant" <urid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%237eitB2IHHA.1280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Not Me" <Not.Me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166521469.754869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have an sql server 2000 machine and our IIS 6 machine running
seperately but on the same domain. I can connect fine to the database
without using impersonation, but when it's enabled I get the error:
"Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted
SQL Server connection."
Was your SQL Server set up with Windows Authentication only?
Aha, I'll check with the admin... was just reading up on how mixed-mode
is required in some circumstances, is this what you're getting at?
cheers,
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: Not Me
- Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- References:
- ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: Not Me
- Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: Uri Dimant
- Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: Not Me
- Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: Uri Dimant
- Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- From: Not Me
- ASP Impersonation - null user
- Prev by Date: Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- Next by Date: Re: Strange integrated authentication success
- Previous by thread: Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- Next by thread: Re: ASP Impersonation - null user
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|