Re: authentication Mode
- From: "Arnie Rowland" <arnie@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:34:46 -0700
Consider using an Application Role rather than user level security.
Look in Books Online for "Establishing Application Security and Application
Roles".
--
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
"JB" <JB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AA8A22DC-D007-4CBE-BFF8-758693B9FCC0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am developing a client/server application using sql server as the back
end.
This app must allow for two login scenarios other than the usual one
user/one workstation. First, the app must allow users to log in from any
machine on the network even when using a machine running under a different
users login. Second, the app must be available to someone that does not
have
a windows login, eg a field worker that needs to access the app
occasionially
using a machine running under a different users login. For these reasons,
I
have been using mixed mode authentication which does the job. Since all
the
documentation seems to recommend Windows authentication mode and mixed
mode
is for backward compability, am I missing something here? Can I handle
the
two scenarios, particularly the second using Windows Authentication?
JB
.
- Prev by Date: Re: XP_CMDSHELL and DB Chaining
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Services Groups
- Previous by thread: RE: XP_CMDSHELL and DB Chaining
- Next by thread: Re: authentication Mode
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|