Re: Permissions for EM
- From: "A McGuire" <allen.mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:42:49 -0500
Note in my initial post - I had to REVOKE all permissions from the public
roles. db_securityadmin, therefore, does not have sufficient privileges any
longer to do anything, so I want to create a new database role with the
permissions needed to allow our security administrators to do their jobs,
which is creating logins, granting privs, etc.
"Arnie Rowland" <arnie@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u1XnaK1pGHA.2292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As long as the user has server login priviliges, they 'should' be able to
use EM. And they will have access to any object with public
permissions -including any other db on the server that allows public
access. (Northwind and Pubs are allow Public access to everything, so they
should be removed from production servers.)
Then to access a specific db, they need to be provided access to the db,
and put in the desired role.
--
Arnie Rowland*
"To be successful, your heart must accompany your knowledge."
"A McGuire" <allen.mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u6rZf10pGHA.3584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What permissions are needed to utilize Enterprise Manager?
Long story, but public role has all rights revoked, so I want to create a
new database role that has access to what it needs to get into the EM.
.
- References:
- Permissions for EM
- From: A McGuire
- Re: Permissions for EM
- From: Arnie Rowland
- Permissions for EM
- Prev by Date: Re: Permissions for EM
- Next by Date: Re: Limiting a user to only executing a stored only that access an
- Previous by thread: Re: Permissions for EM
- Next by thread: Re: Limiting a user to only executing a stored only that access anothe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|