Re: securityadmin
- From: "A McGuire" <allen.mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:54:43 -0500
That is what I had done - I think I found out that I have to explicitly
grant that role access to each database, including Master. I'm just trying
to find out the right combination of least privileged for them to be able to
do their work.
"Uri Dimant" <urid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ONU8JtyoGHA.4152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
After moving them to the logical choice of securityadmin, EM reportsCan you elaborate a little bit what does it mean?
errors about not having access to select data from syslogins and such.
Might I ask how any of you have addressed this sort of scenario, where
you have DBA's and security administrators as separate entities?
No at our shop, however, there is security admin server role.
Read about Fixed Server Roles in the BOL
"A McGuire" <allen.mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23k$rJZeoGHA.4404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At the company I work for, we have security personnel that handle
assigning privileges to databases and object. The security personnel
themselves used to be in the sysadmin fixed server role. After moving
them to the logical choice of securityadmin, EM reports errors about not
having access to select data from syslogins and such.
Might I ask how any of you have addressed this sort of scenario, where
you have DBA's and security administrators as separate entities?
Allen
.
- References:
- securityadmin
- From: A McGuire
- Re: securityadmin
- From: Uri Dimant
- securityadmin
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows NT user or group "XX" not found
- Next by Date: Re: Remove/Add BUILTIN\Administrators 2000 sp4
- Previous by thread: Re: securityadmin
- Next by thread: Re: securityadmin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|