RE: Security hole allows a remote job to run.
- From: stevtek <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:52:58 -0800
Hi Andy,
Ok, so if this user is sa on his SQL Server, he can run his job but
point to our production database tables using the sql account. The
denywrite did work yesterday since it bombed when it got to the point of
trying to insert. But the other job is scripted with 'user defined
functions' and can still run.
If he is using sql account to make a connection in the job than SQL
Server doesn't see his NT account, right? He is not assigned to any
roles.
Thanks for your help~
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Option to change SQL Server service account disabled
- Next by Date: Re: netstat on my server
- Previous by thread: Security hole allows a remote job to run.
- Next by thread: netstat on my server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|