Re: Recommended Approach
From: Dan Johnson (johnson_at_milehi.com)
Date: 11/10/05
- Previous message: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- In reply to: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Next in thread: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Reply: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Reply: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:08:23 -0700
Thanks for your reply Don.
Any suggestions for where I can see how an "xmlhttp post " is done?
Dan
"Don Grover" <dgrover@assoft.com.au> wrote in message
news:%23CKTgBk5FHA.1140@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Not that I have put too much thought into it but here is a possible
> solution.
> Have the vb6 app do a xmlhttp post to your web server and have it do the
> request for subscription date.
> Then depending on what is returned you can download an update or not.
>
> Don
>
>
> "Dan Johnson" <johnson@milehi.com> wrote in message
> news:5660$437357ed$d826dfe9$15934@VIAWEST.NET...
> > Our company has a web site hosted by a third party with a connection to
> > our
> > SQL Server. The SQL Server resides locally behind the company's
firewall.
> >
> > We write software and would like to have our app (written primarily in
> > VB6)
> > occasionally get small amounts of data from our SQL Server. For
example,
> > when the customer/user wants to get the most recent update to our
> > software,
> > we would want to retrieve the effective date of the user's subscription
to
> > make sure they qualify for the update.
> >
> > It is my understanding there are two approaches to doing this. One, we
> > can
> > make a direct ADO connection from the user's PC to our SQL Server. Two,
> > we
> > could (using RDS???) use our web sites connection to process the data
> > request, and return whatever info to the user's PC.
> >
> > Both alternatives require opening up a port on our firewall to allow SQL
> > access (good, bad, ugly???). I would tend to think that using the first
> > alternative is preferable because it seems more efficient (if we're
going
> > to
> > open up the port, may as well streamline the user's connection as much
as
> > possible...).
> >
> > Can anyone point me in the right direction for analysis here? Would be
> > greatly appreciated!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
>
>
- Previous message: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- In reply to: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Next in thread: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Reply: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Reply: Don Grover: "Re: Recommended Approach"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|