Re: Log Shipping or Replication

From: Gabe Matteson (gmatteson_at_inquery.biz.nospam)
Date: 11/02/05


Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:37:22 -0500

Thanks, I appreciate all the replies!

"Chris Shaw" <Chris_Shaw@SQLPASS.org> wrote in message
news:82847E0A-0820-40A4-B07F-130200E5E231@microsoft.com...
> Gabe,
>
> All the answers you have recieved are good ones. Let me see if I can add
> some added information.
>
> Replication for a fail over option can work. I personally would not
> recommend it unless your database is designed for Merge Replication.
> Merge
> replication would give you the ability to start writing to another server
> as
> soon as the failover conncetion is made.
>
> Log Shipping has a time delay on the time the data is moved from the
> production server to the standby server. This is going to depend on your
> t-log backup schedule.
>
> IMHO I would consider looking at less expensive failover options. I use
> both Active/Active and Active/Passive. I perfer A/A becuase the second
> piece
> of hardware is not sitting there doing nothing when the primary node is
> up.
> The other option that I think you need to look at no matter what soultion
> you
> choose is does the application understand the database failover. If a
> conncetion is broken do you have to re-connect manually, or will the app
> look
> for the second server after a certian amount of time without a responce.
> If
> you are at a company where they mention that they can not afford to be
> down
> or they are losing money. Then I would let them know that they really
> can't
> afford to be without a cluster. I know that CDW sells them in a package
> for
> pretty cheap. I have a contact that if you would like send me a note and
> I
> am sure she could get you a good quote.
>
> If you would like more infomation about the 3 options please let us know.
> I
> am sure that you will get a ton of answers.
>
> --Chris
>
> If you wou
>
> "Gabe Matteson" wrote:
>
>> Which would you recommend to setup as a failover database server? (We do
>> not
>> have the ability right now to setup a sql cluster). What is the
>> difference
>> between log shipping and database replication? Pros/Cons? Thanks.
>> - Gabe
>>
>>
>>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Publishers disappeared from under replication monitor
    ... Basically the only database on the server being replicated suddenly had 'no' ... This seemed like some kind of corruption in the database. ... The next day we set up transactional replication again (Yes, ... > distribution agent name you can get a condition like this. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Re: How to Replicate an SQL Server 2000 Database
    ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ... actual server name) enterprise manager should associate the database with ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Re: How to Replicate an SQL Server 2000 Database
    ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ... actual server name) enterprise manager should associate the database with ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Re: How to Replicate an SQL Server 2000 Database
    ... actual server name) enterprise manager should associate the database with the ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Re: Subscriber Transaction Logs Too Large
    ... mentioned not shrinking the file too much on SQL 2000. ... SQL 2005 (Server B). ... alter database databaseName ... Looking for a SQL Server replication book? ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)