Re: Split roles
From: Sue Hoegemeier (Sue_H_at_nomail.please)
Date: 09/28/05
- Next message: Uri Dimant: "Re: Split roles"
- Previous message: Christopher Pankhurst: "Re: Strange requirement for linked server"
- In reply to: Bad Beagle: "Split roles"
- Next in thread: Uri Dimant: "Re: Split roles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:49:11 -0500
The rights needed for the service accounts are outlined in
the following:
HOW TO: Change the SQL Server or SQL Server Agent Service
Account Without Using SQL Enterprise Manager in SQL Server
2000
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=283811
If the dba just runs Enterprise Manager...that's not a good
thing. But in that case, the dba could just be a member of
the sysadmins group in SQL Server.
-Sue
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:28:58 -0600, "Bad Beagle"
<maxwelli@nospam.postalias> wrote:
>Can someone please let me know what are the best practices for securing a
>sql server? The department is split - I have dba's and network analysts.
>The dba's are responsible for sql and the network analysts are responsible
>for the os.
>
>What rights are required for the service accounts?
>What rights does the dba need on the server to run Enterprise Manager?
>
- Next message: Uri Dimant: "Re: Split roles"
- Previous message: Christopher Pankhurst: "Re: Strange requirement for linked server"
- In reply to: Bad Beagle: "Split roles"
- Next in thread: Uri Dimant: "Re: Split roles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
