Re: Inactive record
From: Paul (Paul_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 04/27/05
- Next message: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\): "Re: Is this a security risk?"
- Previous message: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- In reply to: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Next in thread: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: Inactive record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:28:01 -0700
ok thanks for the information.
"Jens Süßmeyer" wrote:
> No there is now row level security based on SQL Server 2000.
>
> HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
>
>
> ---
> http://www.sqlserver2005.de
> ---
>
> "Paul" <Paul@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:BD1A992D-4723-48EA-82C1-7CF94A102258@microsoft.com...
> > Hi just wondering if there is a way to have one record in a table be read
> > only, were an application can not remove it and have all other records act
> > normally? I am currently handling this in .net code but would prefer to
> > have it built into the table.
> > thanks.
> > --
> > Paul G
> > Software engineer.
>
>
>
- Next message: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\): "Re: Is this a security risk?"
- Previous message: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- In reply to: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Next in thread: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: Inactive record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
