Re: Inactive record
From: Jens Süßmeyer (Jens_at_Remove_this_For_Contacting.sqlserver2005.de)
Date: 04/27/05
- Previous message: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- In reply to: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Next in thread: Paul: "Re: Inactive record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:25:31 +0200
Sorry, i mean : No there is no row level security based on SQL Server 2000.
"Jens Süßmeyer" <Jens@Remove_this_For_Contacting.sqlserver2005.de> schrieb
im Newsbeitrag news:eNTxiwzSFHA.612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> No there is now row level security based on SQL Server 2000.
>
> HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
>
>
> ---
> http://www.sqlserver2005.de
> ---
>
> "Paul" <Paul@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:BD1A992D-4723-48EA-82C1-7CF94A102258@microsoft.com...
>> Hi just wondering if there is a way to have one record in a table be read
>> only, were an application can not remove it and have all other records
>> act
>> normally? I am currently handling this in .net code but would prefer to
>> have it built into the table.
>> thanks.
>> --
>> Paul G
>> Software engineer.
>
>
- Previous message: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- In reply to: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Next in thread: Paul: "Re: Inactive record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|