Re: Inactive record
From: Jens Süßmeyer (Jens_at_Remove_this_For_Contacting.sqlserver2005.de)
Date: 04/27/05
- Next message: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Previous message: Paul: "Inactive record"
- In reply to: Paul: "Inactive record"
- Next in thread: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Reply: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Reply: Paul: "Re: Inactive record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:16:19 +0200
No there is now row level security based on SQL Server 2000.
HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.
--- http://www.sqlserver2005.de --- "Paul" <Paul@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:BD1A992D-4723-48EA-82C1-7CF94A102258@microsoft.com... > Hi just wondering if there is a way to have one record in a table be read > only, were an application can not remove it and have all other records act > normally? I am currently handling this in .net code but would prefer to > have it built into the table. > thanks. > -- > Paul G > Software engineer.
- Next message: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Previous message: Paul: "Inactive record"
- In reply to: Paul: "Inactive record"
- Next in thread: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Reply: Jens Süßmeyer: "Re: Inactive record"
- Reply: Paul: "Re: Inactive record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|