Re: Why Windows Authentication?

From: Jason Mauss (jason.mauss_at_nospamgmail.com)
Date: 03/30/05

  • Next message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Remote server Error..."
    Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:54:13 -0800
    
    

    Ok, now I'm starting to see some more advantages...

    I assume the most secure and manageable way to implement user name/password
    for a web application would be to use an application role and create a
    certain windows user account for your web application then. Am I right?

    "Jacco Schalkwijk" <jacco.please.reply@to.newsgroups.mvps.org.invalid> wrote
    in message news:OLF60hUNFHA.2356@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    > User has to fill in another login screen.
    >
    > --
    > Jacco Schalkwijk
    > SQL Server MVP
    >
    >
    > "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@hotmail.nomail.com> wrote
    in
    > message news:ekYzQOUNFHA.2748@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
    > > Other disadvantaged with SQL Server logins:
    > >
    > > Yet another password to remember, write down, waiting to be stolen
    > > No enforcement to change password after x number of days
    > > No rules for password complexity
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
    > > http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
    > > http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
    > > http://www.sqlug.se/
    > >
    > >
    > > "Jason Mauss" <jason.mauss@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message
    > > news:e4YWPCUNFHA.3760@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
    > >> So the only reason I've heard of so far is that the password encryption
    > >> is
    > >> less secure than Windows. That can't be the only reason...?
    > >>
    > >> Jason
    > >>
    > >> "Jacco Schalkwijk" <jacco.please.reply@to.newsgroups.mvps.org.invalid>
    > >> wrote
    > >> in message news:OQDNVZKNFHA.1436@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > >>> The credentials when using SQL Server authentication are not passed as
    > >> clear
    > >>> text, but the encryption is not very strong either. If you capture the
    > >>> password in encrypted form, it is possible to decrypt it without
    > >> additional
    > >>> information (like a private key).
    > >>>
    > >>> --
    > >>> Jacco Schalkwijk
    > >>> SQL Server MVP
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> "pdxJaxon" <GregoryAJackson@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > >>> news:%234$wwPKNFHA.1948@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    > >>> > lots of reasons.
    > >>> >
    > >>> > One of the main things is that SQL credentials are passed clear
    text.
    > >>> >
    > >>> > yes you can use groups\roles etc
    > >>> >
    > >>> >
    > >>> > Greg Jackson
    > >>> > PDX, Oregon
    > >>> >
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >
    >
    >


  • Next message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Remote server Error..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: How to secure a table within a database?
      ... SQL Server MVP ... I am trying to secure 2 tables within a db. ... question (thereby locking the others out I thought) and giving them access - ...
      (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
    • Re: Frustrated :(
      ... If it's secure, you could protect some processes in DTS. ... >> Ron Talmage ... >> SQL Server MVP ...
      (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
    • Re: Is .NET Passport credential traffic secure?
      ... The credentials - user name/password - are sent using encrypted channel. ... >From that perspective, .Net Passport is secure. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)