Re: To DMZ or not DMZ
From: John Bell (jbellnewsposts_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: vince.iacoboni_at_db.com: "Kerberos authentication problems"
- Previous message: John Bell: "Re: Table OWNER"
- In reply to: Peter Kaufman: "To DMZ or not DMZ"
- Next in thread: Peter Kaufman: "Re: To DMZ or not DMZ"
- Reply: Peter Kaufman: "Re: To DMZ or not DMZ"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:33:42 -0000
Hi
I am not sure why you wish to change the current configuration if it is
already accessed from inside and outside?
You may want to look at the best practices described at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/sp3sec04.mspx
John
"Peter Kaufman" <pmkdatabase_at_yahoo_dot_ca> wrote in message
news:me4is01h9f3qbm3d10g7k2r73fir3551vo@4ax.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have an sql database that is accessed both from Intranet and a few
> users on the Internet. I am having a hard time deciding whether to put
> the database server on a DMZ and set up a second one for internal
> usage or just continue on with the server behind a good firewall but
> on the LAN, and a member of the internal domain.
>
> It is going to be a hassle (and expensive) to use two SQL servers for
> this - not only will I have to keep them synced, now the outside users
> authenticate with AD user names/passwords.
>
> What would you guys do?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
- Next message: vince.iacoboni_at_db.com: "Kerberos authentication problems"
- Previous message: John Bell: "Re: Table OWNER"
- In reply to: Peter Kaufman: "To DMZ or not DMZ"
- Next in thread: Peter Kaufman: "Re: To DMZ or not DMZ"
- Reply: Peter Kaufman: "Re: To DMZ or not DMZ"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
