RE: is this disaster recovery / 'high availabilty" setup OK?
From: Dave (Dave_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Dave: "Re: Read Only User - One Database"
- Previous message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Read Only User - One Database"
- In reply to: Doug Fox: "is this disaster recovery / 'high availabilty" setup OK?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:52:01 -0700
What you want to achieve by using 2 servers ? to me using 2 servers for
accounting is not a good idea.
about backup - that is fine if you put databases in sync.
"Doug Fox" wrote:
> An accounting application uses a SQL server.
>
> I am going to use two SQL servers for this application. These two SQL
> servers are sync between them.
>
> Each night, a copy of the SQL database is copied to a network share, and
> then the backup program, ARCserve, will back up the database on the network
> share nightly.
>
> Is this approach a best practice? Any pointers/comments/suggestions are
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
- Next message: Dave: "Re: Read Only User - One Database"
- Previous message: Sue Hoegemeier: "Re: Read Only User - One Database"
- In reply to: Doug Fox: "is this disaster recovery / 'high availabilty" setup OK?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|