Re: Who should be owner if bd?
From: Dan Guzman (danguzman_at_nospam-earthlink.net)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Dan Guzman: "Re: User added via group membership"
- Previous message: Dan Guzman: "Re: SQL user with no login name"
- In reply to: Hari Prasad: "Re: Who should be owner if bd?"
- Next in thread: Hari Prasad: "Re: Who should be owner if bd?"
- Reply: Hari Prasad: "Re: Who should be owner if bd?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:11:10 -0500
Hari, perhaps you meant sp_changedbowner?
-- Hope this helps. Dan Guzman SQL Server MVP "Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23P3uvf0bEHA.796@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi, > > It should not be a problem. Only thing is change the database owner (Use > sp_dbchangeowner) > incase the administrator drops/renames the nt login currently owns the > database. > > Thanks > Hari > MCDBA > > "Laura" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:150901c46f31$01a8d920$a601280a@phx.gbl... > > I restored the databse on the SQL 2000 server and was > > logged in to the server under my NT account (it is an > > Admin account). Now the owner of the database is my NT > > account. > > Should the owner really be sa? > > > >
- Next message: Dan Guzman: "Re: User added via group membership"
- Previous message: Dan Guzman: "Re: SQL user with no login name"
- In reply to: Hari Prasad: "Re: Who should be owner if bd?"
- Next in thread: Hari Prasad: "Re: Who should be owner if bd?"
- Reply: Hari Prasad: "Re: Who should be owner if bd?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|