Re: Schemas

From: Dejan Sarka (dejan_please_reply_to_newsgroups.sarka_at_avtenta.si)
Date: 11/11/03 

Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:47:59 -0800

> Why use the name 'Schemas' in Yukon for namespaces of objects? Can't we
find
> a better name?

"Schema" is an ANSI standard expression. You can always suggest a better
name - send a mail to sqlwish@microsoft.com. 

-- 
Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
Please reply only to the newsgroups.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Splitting xml files using Document and Envelope Schemas
    ... Just seemed like once the file was broken up, Biztalk did not recognize it. ... Maybe it would be easier for me to see the schemas, envelope, and sample ... > Well I did have target namespaces set for both schemas. ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: getting rid of NS0 (name space) in xml tags
    ... our partner is using bts2004 and I'm using ... My envelope/document schemas ... I am not too surprised or bothered that the inbound xml is ... As I know U can ignore the prefixes if U don't want to use the namespaces ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: concatenate several xml files into one big xml/html file?
    ... So schemas allow you to incorporate different namespaces, ... own custom grammar. ... it's the same answer as with any other code reuse ...
    (comp.text.xml)
  • Re: Versioning XML Schemas
    ... Never seen the verions in the namespaces. ... Regards, ... Leonid Ganeline, ... > I've seen many schemas and most of the people put version in the target ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)
  • Re: Versioning XML Schemas
    ... using versions in the namespaces has the same advantage as it has ... with" different schemas in the production environment we'd rather use the ... Vancouver, ... > BizTalk Developer, MCSD, ...
    (microsoft.public.biztalk.general)