Re: SQL Server benchmarks comparing disk setups?
From: Karl Levinson [x y] mvp (levinson_k@excite.com)
Date: 02/03/03
- Next message: Mike Mullane: "Status column of sysusers table"
- Previous message: bhavesh: "Run only one job with different user account"
- In reply to: x y, mvp: "SQL Server benchmarks comparing disk setups?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Karl Levinson [x y] mvp" <levinson_k@excite.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:26:42 -0500
Very sorry, wrong newsgroup. I will repost in a more accurate newsgroup.
"x y, mvp" <levinson_k@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:OZwUPs4yCHA.2292@TK2MSFTNGP10...
> I searched google and couldn't find the answer.
>
> I'm needing to make a business case to support recommending three
different
> disk arrays for a SQL server, e.g. a mirror for the OS, a mirror for the
> transaction logs, and RAID 5 or 10 for the database files.
>
> So, does anyone know of any published benchmarks showing what a typical
> difference in performance we might expect compared to, say, installing
> everything onto one RAID 5 array? [Or even if you have personal
experience
> with both types of setups that might help me... some sort of way to
quantify
> whether the increase in cost is worth it, and why and how much.]
>
> I realize that this performance will vary depending on what the SQL server
> is being used for.
>
> Also, I have a hard time figuring out how putting the transaction logs
onto
> a disk mirror will be faster, given that (1) having multiple transaction
> logs on a single mirror should disrupt the sequential writes as the drive
> heads move from log to log, and (2) disk writes are slower on a mirror
than
> on RAID 5. I'm wrong to think this, correct?
>
>
>
- Next message: Mike Mullane: "Status column of sysusers table"
- Previous message: bhavesh: "Run only one job with different user account"
- In reply to: x y, mvp: "SQL Server benchmarks comparing disk setups?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|